Yeon Woo Ku vs Elza Tomase Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 03:28 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Woo Ku vs E. Tomase

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

LAT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ku 1 - 0 Tomase
They have played 2 sets in total, with Yeon Woo Ku winning 2 and Elza Tomase winning 0. The last match between Yeon Woo Ku and Elza Tomase was at the W35 Lagos, 21-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Yeon Woo Ku getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ku | 1 |
| Tomase | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Lagos(10-21-25)
Y. W. Ku vs E. Tomase H2H Profile
Y. W. Ku vs E. Tomase Match Preview:
- In recent months, Yeon Woo Ku shows a stronger second serve performance, winning 37.81% of points, compared to Elza Tomase's 33.24%.
- When it comes to return games, Yeon Woo Ku is more efficient, winning 52.16% of opponent's second serve points as opposed to Elza Tomase's 46.84%.
- Against first serves, Yeon Woo Ku has an edge, capturing 36.82% of points compared to Elza Tomase's 27.41%. Could this translate to a match advantage?
- Under pressure, both players have similar breakpoint saving stats, with Elza Tomase narrowly ahead at 45.51% versus Yeon Woo Ku's 44.68%.
- Performance overview shows Yeon Woo Ku at 67.14% match wins in the past year, while Elza Tomase closely trails with 66.67%.
- Both players shine on indoor hard courts with a win rate of 69%, but struggle differently on their worst surfaces, grass for Yeon Woo Ku and clay for Elza Tomase.
- When considering tournament levels, both players perform strongly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with negligible difference in win percentages (Yeon Woo Ku at 68.33% and Elza Tomase at 68.75%).
- Yeon Woo Ku faces opponents with an average rank of 430.9, while Elza Tomase plays against higher-ranked competition averaging 342.67; could this tougher opposition provide an edge?
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Elza Tomase has a better track record, winning 50% of such sets compared to Yeon Woo Ku's 40%.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the players' strengths and recent performances, Yeon Woo Ku appears to have a slight advantage in second serve statistics and returning games. This could spell trouble for Elza Tomase if the serve-receive dynamic is critical in this matchup.
Elza Tomase, however, presents a robust challenge with her experience against slightly higher-ranked opponents and a better success rate in deciding sets, making her a resilient competitor.
While both players enjoy similar success on indoor hard courts—the surface of their upcoming clash—Yeon Woo Ku seems slightly better equipped to capitalize on return opportunities, which might come in handy during pivotal moments.
Overall, the marginal discrepancies in performance metrics suggest that Yeon Woo Ku has a subtle yet real edge, making her the likely frontrunner for victory in this encounter.
Yeon Woo Ku vs Elza Tomase Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. W. Ku vs E. Tomase H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:33:6 | Average Match Time | 1:33:6 |
| 68% (40/59) | 1st Serve % | 58% (32/55) |
| 63% (25/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (21/32) |
| 47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (6/23) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 51% (28/55) | Return Points Win % | 42% (25/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. W. Ku Recent Matches Played
E. Tomase Recent Matches Played

Y. W. Ku vs E. Tomase Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.83% (212/115) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.64% (21/12) |
| 63.86% (477/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.81% (45/29) |
| 57.18% (3850/2883) | Games Win/Loss | 54.19% (362/306) |
| 64.59% (166/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.54% (16/10) |
| 64.86% (24/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 68.97% (20/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 100.00% (5/0) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 234 | Aces Total | 73 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.52 |
| 1048 | Total Double Faults | 169 |
| 1:25:43 | Average Match Time | 1:22:8 |
| 463.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 368.48 |
| 64% (12133/18964) | 1st Serve % | 54% (933/1735) |
| 61% (7379/12133) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (599/933) |
| 45% (3096/6831) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (346/802) |
| 52% (1445/2788) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (109/232) |
| 50% (9520/18945) | Return Points Win % | 47% (826/1756) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62.83% (142/84) | Challenger W/L | 56.52% (13/10) |
| 74.42% (64/22) | Futures W/L | 80.00% (8/2) |
| 65% (210/323) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (21/33) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (33/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
| 43% (40/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 86% (218/187) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (19/18) |
| 14% (218/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (19/1) |
| 23% (109/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (14/3) |